Clinical Outcomes of a Large, Prospective Series of Gastric Electrical Stimulation Patients Using a Multidisciplinary Protocol

Douglas J Cassidy; William Gerull; Valerie M Zike; Michael M Awad

doi:10.1097/XCS.0000000000001105

Clinical Outcomes of a Large, Prospective Series of Gastric Electrical Stimulation Patients Using a Multidisciplinary Protocol

J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Apr 29. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001105. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Douglas J Cassidy¹, William Gerull, Valerie M Zike, Michael M Awad

Affiliation

¹ Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

PMID: 38682813
DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001105

Abstract

Background: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an intervention used in the treatment of medically refractory gastroparesis. There are few large series demonstrating efficacy over a long-term follow-up period. This study reports clinical outcomes for patients from a single institution up to 5 years.

Study design: A prospective database of patients undergoing GES implantation for gastroparesis was collected and reviewed. Patients were selected according to a multi-disciplinary institutional protocol. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, smoking history, etiology of gastroparesis, and duration of gastroparesis symptoms, were collected. Symptomatic response was evaluated utilizing Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) surveys pre-operatively and at subsequent follow-up visits. Other clinical outcome variables include medication use, hospitalizations due to gastroparesis, and overall satisfaction with symptom relief. Patient outcomes regarding reoperation and explantation were also recorded.

Results: 157 patients underwent GES at our institution since 2012. GCSI scores were collected in all patients at baseline, in 141 patients at 1 year follow-up, and in 110 patients at 5 years follow-up. Symptom severity in all 9 gastroparesis symptoms evaluated by the GCSI, as well as the total GCSI score, was reduced significantly at 1 year post-operatively, and these results were sustained at 5-year follow-up. Use of prokinetic and antiemetic medications was reduced during the follow-up period. Hospitalizations due to gastroparesis symptoms were also reduced. GES devices were explanted in 5 patients, 12 patients required generator exchanges, and 7 patients required reoperation due to displaced/eroded device leads during the study period.

Conclusion: Gastric electrical stimulation is associated with sustained symptomatic relief, reduced reliance on medications, and reduced hospitalizations in gastroparesis patients selected utilizing our institutional protocol.